Documentary film can be categorized according to their subject matter. The earliest documentary is a single-shot moment and called "film actuality." These films are more real than fiction. Until 1926, the term "documentary" did not exist. This type of film is an example of creative care actuality. Some examples of documentary films are as follows: Manhatta (New York), Rien Que Les Heure, and Man with a film camera.
Some of the most popular documentaries are compilation. They often contain a number of short non-fiction films in a coherent narrative. This documentary tends to be categorized based on themes, genres, and subject matter. Many of these films focus on one topic or event, and often looked overall. Some are more esoteric than others. Some are titled as "reports" rather than "documentary films."
Some critics question the validity of the term "documentary film" at all. They refer to these films as "DOCU-Double" or "Mondo Films." While Flaherty is credited by developing these terms, this phenomenon is widely recognized today. Ontological foundations that have a problem from documentary forms may be a contributing factor. If this is the problem, it is necessary to overcome these problems before the genre can grow in popularity.
Documentary film which is an expository often uses VoiceOver to talk to their viewers. Often, these films are told by a rich man's voice. Their message is usually omniscient and objective. The pictures in these films are secondary to arguments. In addition, viewers are often pressed to read images in a certain way. They are media that conveyed ideology. They are not a source of knowledge.
Some critics question the term "documentary film" because they equalize it with the word "documentary". They often refer to the As'mondo Films' documentary film "or 'DOCU-Double Films', and often use the term" documentary film "to refer to any film which is expository. These films can be criticized by their nature. This is the thing General. This is a common criticism of documentary films. They are basically a work of art that aims to tell the audience.
The term مستند ایکسونامی has a history of a problematic association with the term. It can be used to describe a film that has been marketed as a "documentary" by a large number of people. However, in recent years, this term has become an insulting term in the context of documentary films. While the critics questioned the title of the documentary film, they also questioned the ontological foundation of the concept.
The term "documentary" can also be applied to a film that does not present a point of view. The point of view could be a good thing, but the problem with this type of film tends to be too subjective. A filmmaker can be accused of being biased if they use aka to protect their point of view. This is a serious problem, but it's still a legitimate question.
